July 30, 2002
By: Joseph Sanscrainte, General Counsel
jws@callcompliance.com
The Tricky Issue of DNC Exemptions
One of the most important
questions facing telemarketers is whether the calls they make for
a campaign are exempt under one or more state do-not-call laws.
This exemption question is critical given that an incorrect answer
can bring substantial fines and penalties, which in turn can tarnish
a telemarketer's reputation.
The answer to this
question is - it depends. With the recent enactment of DNC legislation
in Kansas and Vermont, 25 states have DNC lists in place. To answer
the exemption question, each state has the DNC law itself, other
related statutes and very often a number of implementing regulations
and rules that must be reviewed. In addition, many states have separate
laws and regulations governing registration procedures for the privilege
of conducting telemarketing within the state.
It is important to
note that under many state laws, there are two sets of exemptions:
telemarketer registration exemptions and DNC list exemptions. Generally,
the former set of exemptions predates and is more numerous than
the latter.
Registration exemptions
are in place to offset existing registration fees many industries
have to pay for the privilege of doing business in a particular
state. When enacting telemarketer registration laws, the states
took this into account and made these industries exempt from yet
another set of fees. DNC list exemptions serve a different and more
political purpose, representing the collective wisdom of state legislators
regarding the merits of different telemarketing calls.
After identifying which
part of the statute relates specifically to the DNC list (a task
made easier by states that have launched DNC information Web sites),
a telemarketer needs to look at what exemptions have been expressly
identified by the state.
Embedded in the DNC
list laws and regulations, however, are definitions of such key
terms as "telemarketer" or "telephonic solicitation"
or "telemarketing." Depending upon the interpretation
of these definitions, there may be, and most likely are, other exemptions.
A number of states list exemptions on their DNC Web sites that do
not appear in the DNC statute itself, based upon the regulatory
agency's interpretation of key definitions in the statute. Whether
similar "definitional" exemptions exist for other types
of calls beyond those already identified by the states is a crucial
issue for telemarketers that will be addressed over time.
Finally, the exemptions
themselves may have a definitional component as well, which may
restrict the applicability of the exemption. For example, most states
have expressly exempted calls made to people who have a business
relationship with the company responsible for the calls. However,
a telemarketer needs to look at how a particular state defines the
term "business relationship." The telemarketer also must
consider the length of time the state allows between the last transaction
with a customer and when the call is being made. For example, a
call made to a prior customer who made a purchase 12 months before
the call would be exempt in Arkansas, but not in Louisiana.
The sheer number of
exemptions, along with associated definitional complexities, can
make for treacherous telemarketing waters. Correct navigation, involving
a careful review of all pertinent laws and regulations as well as
the advice of counsel, will let telemarketers avoid the many compliance
pitfalls in today's DNC regulatory environment.
|