| April
4, 1999
E-COMMERCE
/ Services Offer Break From Unwanted Sales Pitches
COMPANIES
WANT consumers to know about and hopefully purchase their products
and services, bottom line. According to a report by the Direct Marketing
Association, corporations spend more than $24 billion a year on
direct mail advertising and telemarketing to inform the public about
their products and services. That expense helped spur direct mail
and telemarketing related sales figures of more than $267 billion
last year, according to DMA reports.
With
companies allocating such amounts, consumers have been left to fend
off the increasing advertising intrusions into their homes, like
the call, right at dinner time, from a chimney sweeper.
There
may now be a way around those aggressive tactics. Telemarketing
companies and direct mail advertisers find customers by purchasing
lists of names from marketing firms that include addresses and telephone
numbers of consumers. This type of hit-or-miss sales approach is
both costly to advertisers and aggravating to consumers. In a new
service being touted by the company as a first of its kind, San
Francisco-based populardemand is offering consumers a way to cut
down on and possibly eliminate unwanted direct mail and telemarketing
calls. According to the company Web site, www.unlistMe.com, populardemand
will work to remove those who request the service from direct mail
and telemarketing lists for the rest of the consumer's life at no
cost.
After the initial membership registration, which asks for the consumer's
name, e-mail address, street address and telephone number, the Web
site will ask to enroll consumers in a program designed to give
members a way to get information and deals on products that interest
them without worrying about being bombarded with e-mail, direct
mail and phone calls.
"Our
goal is to give consumers a safe haven where they are in control
and their privacy is respected," said Shyamala Reddy, vice
president of product development for populardemand in a released
statement.
Another
service, Call Compliance.com Inc., also offers consumers the ability
to add their names to do-not-call lists by offering a service called
Telestop. After subscribing, which carries an annual fee of $7.50
to block one or two telephone numbers, Glen Cove-based CCI will
add that subscriber's name to their do-not-call list, which is then
distributed to all telemarketers and other telephone/fax solicitors
that subscribe to CCI's Teleblock service.
Teleblock
is an automated blocking service that enables telemarketing companies
to have phone calls blocked to all individuals and businesses listed
on a telemarketers do-not-call list. According to CCI, Teleblock
is provided to companies at a very nominal charge, the only stipulation
being that the company must sign up with long-distance telephone
carriers who have connection agreements with CCI. CCI's Web
site is at www.callcompliance.com.
Some industry members are wary about what third-party agencies like
CCI and populardemand will actually be able to accomplish. According
to Chet Dalzell, spokesman for the DMA, it's very important that
consumers understand exactly what it is that they are being promised
and that companies actually deliver what they claim. "Consumers
need to make an informed decision rather than an emotional one,"
Dalzell said. "We want people to be able to receive the information
on products that they desire and not to simply receive nothing from
now on." Consumers are also afforded protection from unwanted
solicitation in their homes under the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991 that sets forth guidelines that telemarketers must follow,
including limiting the calls to the period between 8 a.m and 9 p.m.,
and maintaining a "do not call list" and honoring any
requests to not be called again. According to the TCPA, when such
a request is received, the requester may not be called again. Companies
that violate that policy are subject to criminal prosecution.
Copyright
1999, Newsday Inc.
E-COMMERCE
/ Services Offer Break From Unwanted Sales Pitches., 04-12-1999,
pp C07.
|